Blog

OpenAI Becomes Public-Benefit Corporation to Meet Rising AI Demand and Ensure Societal Responsibility

Hannah Perry | May 6, 2025

Responsive image

OpenAI Transitions to Public-Benefit Corporation Amid Growing Demand for AI

OpenAI, the prominent artificial intelligence startup, recently announced a significant shift in its corporate structure as it grapples with the burgeoning demand for its AI services. A letter from CEO Sam Altman revealed that the company will abandon its previous plans to transition into a full-profit entity, opting instead to remain under the control of a nonprofit organization. This change comes as OpenAI acknowledges that it “currently cannot supply nearly as much AI as the world wants,” prompting the need to place restrictions on its offerings and slow down its rollout of new features.

Background of the Decision

OpenAI was established nearly a decade ago, with a vision that has evolved significantly since its inception. In the letter dated May 5, 2025, Altman expressed surprise at the current state of AI demand, stating, “We had no idea this was going to be the state of the world when we launched our research lab almost a decade ago.” The decision to maintain its nonprofit status comes after extensive consultations with civic leaders and legal advisors from the Delaware and California attorney general’s offices.

Formation of the Public-Benefit Corporation

OpenAI’s for-profit subsidiary will now change its structure to a Public-Benefit Corporation (PBC). This new model is designed to balance the interests of shareholders with the overarching mission of the organization. As Altman explained, the nonprofit will maintain control over the PBC and will serve as a significant shareholder, providing better resources for achieving their dual goals of profitability and broader societal benefits.

Controversy Surrounding Corporate Structure

The initial plans for OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model faced backlash from employees and prominent AI thinkers. Notably, Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “godfather of AI,” criticized the proposed restructure, arguing against the incentives that would compromise safety in AI development. Furthermore, co-founder Elon Musk expressed his belief that the organization’s focus should remain on safety and open-source technology, even submitting a bid to acquire the nonprofit arm of OpenAI. Musk is currently at the helm of xAI, a competing AI firm, underscoring a rising trend among AI organizations that have chosen the PBC model, including rivals like Anthropic and xAI.

Rationale for Shifting to a Standard Capital Structure

In his letter, Altman articulated the necessity of shifting from OpenAI’s “current complex capped-profit structure” to a more traditional capital setup where stockholders could have ownership stakes. He highlighted the changing landscape of AI development, where many viable companies are emerging. The objective is clear: to optimize resource availability and effectively respond to the inevitable financial demands of AI evolution. Altman estimates that fulfilling their mission may require “hundreds of billions of dollars and may eventually require trillions of dollars.”

OpenAI’s Future Goals

The newly established structure is focused on three strategic goals: first, to make services widely available to humanity; second, to pursue recognition as the largest and most effective nonprofit organization in history; and third, to achieve “beneficial AGI”—artificial intelligence with capabilities comparable to human intelligence. In a press conference, Altman explained the potential of these advanced AI systems to foster significant benefits across society.

Financing According to New Structure

Despite the restructuring, OpenAI is still set to receive a substantial investment of $30 billion from SoftBank. This funding is crucial as it allows the company to further develop its offerings while upholding its mission-driven ethos. During the press conference, OpenAI Chairman Bret Taylor indicated that employees, investors, and the organization itself would have opportunities to own parts of the Public-Benefit Corporation, creating a more inclusive model of ownership and mission alignment.

Conclusion

In an era where demand for AI is at an unprecedented high, OpenAI’s decision to remain a nonprofit, alongside the establishment of a PBC, reflects a growing need for balance between profit-driven motives and societal responsibility. As AI technologies continue to evolve, OpenAI aims to pioneer an approach that prioritizes human welfare while fostering innovation and efficiency in artificial intelligence development.